The dynamics of creation of inequalities combined several simultaneous processes that, according to the thinking of the time, corresponded to the different "moments" of the processes delineated from the theoretical point of view: on the one hand, the hoarding of resources through the plundering and primitive accumulation, both in reference to mobile phone number list the origin of the labor force required by capitalist development and to the privatization of the land for the expansion of mercantile agriculture, with the displacement of native peoples and peasants and the prevalence of semi-servile work in the mines and farms; on the other hand, the exploitation within the capitalist system itself and the hoarding of other resources, The explanatory analytical axis was centered on the labor market as the force behind the structure and distribution mobile phone number list of inequalities.
Positions in the labor market could be associated with other dimensions: ethnicity intertwined with the economic sector (for example, a peasantry with strong indigenous components in the rural sector), a nascent salaried working class formed on the mobile phone number list basis of European immigration , or the predominance of women of rural origin in urban domestic service. The social class structure (with all the necessary "local" specificities) was at the center; the other dimensions of inequality were articulated with class dynamics, but did not determine them.
These other criteria of social categorization, especially ethnicity and race, could be analyzed, but in general they were mobile phone number list considered as "inheritance" or diachronic presences of the past. For their part, those who interpreted social processes in terms of modernization thought that these ascribed categories would dissolve to the extent that merit and achievement displaced origin as the most important anchor for defining social opportunities.